Gwen Foster’s experience with various health technologies

These are my personal opinions about health technology that is out there.  Please note this is from personal experience, personal use and/or exposure. This is not meant to be a technical assessment.

There are a number of systems that are in the “random number generator or RNG” category. These systems are the oldest of the health scanning technology and definitely have limitations.  The Indigo (formerly, the SCIO and EPFX and QXCI) was very cumbersome to work with, very expensive to learn and not reproducible. The hardware box is nothing more than wires to control the LED’s which I think is misleading.  Take one apart and you will see.  When you buy and Indigo, no one tells you there are paid upgrades that are necessary for support, and at one point, I got to a number of clients that required me to pay again for the license.  (I don’t remember how many clients that was but I was never told that I had a limit).  I had over $100,000 invested between the initial purchase, hardware add on’s, training courses (which were necessary to know what you were doing), and a second SCIO.  I remember going to training courses that were great, only to get home and I wasn’t able to figure out how to get back to 10 screens deep to find what they had demonstrated. This was because it was a DOS platform being migrated to Windows without starting over in Windows.  Then there is Bill Nelson (or Desiree depending on what year it is), who has had the reputation of cutting SCIO/Indigo users off because he doesn’t like them or they contradicted him.  There has also been huge upheavals with local distributors and support.  There have also been people that paid for systems or upgrades that never got them and there is no recourse because he is in Europe.

But the real problem with SCIO and most random number generators are the lack of reproducibility and all the mumbo jumbo you get from the SCIO practitioners about the scan results, and the basic lies that are taught from the top about the interpretation and use of the SCIO box and straps. The straps are not necessary, period.  If you do a SCIO/Indigo scan on a person every 5 minutes for an hour, every result will be different and I mean completely different. This is the nature of a true random number generator.  In my opinion, the SCIO and Indigo’s are only as good as the practitioner using them.  If they are intuitive or have other testing methods like muscle testing to discern the top health factors, then they use the data very loosely.  Then they are told to look at the highest and lowest numbers for relevancy, and this is because the data is random.  Also, most random number generators are not customizable. If you are looking at comparing other health technology, that is the first question I would ask – is the data reproducible from one scan to the next? If they say no, then you are dealing with older technology, like comparing your flip phone to the latest iPhone.

Customizing your data to fit your way of working with clients is super important.  And it should be easy to add your own data or datasets to a health software scanning system. You want your health software to be a natural extension of what you are doing with clients.  You should be able to input the products you use or any modality information that is unique to how you get great results with your clients.

In my opinion, the L.I.F.E. system is a complete knock off of the QXCI/SCIO but like a Fred Flintstone version graphically.  It did not have any new features except the data sets were slightly different.

The CoRe Inergetix system is basically out of business and it’s hard to get support for people that already have CoRe systems.  Kiran, the owner has went over the deep end and I do not recommend this system.  

NES has sort of resurrected lately.  The NES system is not reproducible and you cannot customize their data.  You are dependent on them to buy their limited number of remedies (which are not cheap) and the database is quite small. (With NuVision, you can imprint your own remedies.)  I’m not a fan of their current management as many of the “good” people have left NES.  That have advanced to a more graphically pleasing program and added some new gadgets that make them more appealing to visual people.

ASYRA is a simplistic testing device for remedies but is not reproducible so I don’t recommend them. EIS is not very prevalent in the USA and the same technology is called DDFAO in Europe. I have not had good results in testing this equipment. I’ve only seen one Introspect in the USA and it was very pricey and I did not hear of good results from the lady practitioner that used it in my office (she rented space from me). The explanation given by most of these companies about the data scan results not being reproducible is that the “body is changing every second”.  Well, that’s not technically true.  If a person is sitting in a chair and has not moved, eaten or drank anything, has not went to the bathroom or received any news that would affect them emotionally, then they haven’t changed at all.  Most people that buy random number generator technology are very disappointed once they realize they cannot depend on the results. And the cost of most of these systems is $15,000 to $35,000 for OLD technology.  

NuVision is reproducible, displaying scan results in an easy to interpret coloring system. Sometimes, it’s actually frustrating how little the body does change when you want it to. NuVision has the added feature of being able to schedule remedies for short or long term, which most RNG’s can’t do.  They can imprint, broadcast or zap in the moment when you have the client loaded for analysis, but you can’t schedule support for weeks or months like you can with NuVision.

RIFE and Microcurrent and PEMF technologies offer specific and targeted frequencies and microcurrents for specific applications.  These are very hands on and working only when connected to the currents.  The limitation is in the frequencies and programs that are available. Some of these devices are very limited with only 6 to 10 applications, while some are more open ended, meaning you can input the specific frequencies you want to use if you have the research and data to do custom frequencies for specific conditions. This type of technologically does not typically offer the ability to analyze a client.

M.E.A.D. and other acupuncture and acupoint software is as good as the practitioner and their knowledge of acupuncture and Traditional Chinese Medicine.  If they don’t hit the points right or don’t make the proper interpretation or make the right recommendation based on the data, then this type of testing is not very effective.  Also, this type of equipment does not usually offer a solution, it’s just used for testing meridians for high or low energy.

Thermal Imaging and PIP Photography offer additional ways to see the body that is outside of traditional Western Medicine.  Thermal imaging measures heat and inflammation of the body. PIP Photography is way to look at the body’s energy fields.

(Please note I had a very bad experience with MedHot and Carol Chandler.  After buying a $25,000 Thermal Imaging Camera, and later upgrading to a $35,000 camera, it stopped working right outside of warranty and they said it could not be repaired and I would have to buy a new one.  When I did not buy a new one, I later found out, she sold or gave my client data to an ex-employee of mine in the Houston area.  I do not recommend this company at all.  I have a friend that had a similar bad experience with Carol Chandler.  I like Thermal Imaging and I would try to find another company to do business with.)